AN ANALYSIS ON REPRESENTATIVE ACTS IN FILM “ HARRY POTTER AND THE PHILOSHOPER’S STONE” by J.K. ROWLING

NIKMAH, DEWI LUTFIATUN (2015) AN ANALYSIS ON REPRESENTATIVE ACTS IN FILM “ HARRY POTTER AND THE PHILOSHOPER’S STONE” by J.K. ROWLING. [ Skripsi ]

	Text COVER TANPA HALAMAN.pdf Download (120kB)
Preview	Text 0-ARTIKEL.pdf Download (475kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 1-COVER.pdf Download (881kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 2- CHAPTER 1.pdf Download (242kB) | Preview
	Text 3- CHAPTER II.pdf Download (276kB)
	Text 4- CHAPTER III.pdf Download (318kB)
Preview	Text 5- CHAPTER IV.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text 6- CHAPTER V.pdf Download (349kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 7-APPENDIXES.pdf Download (80kB) | Preview
	Text 8-APPENDIX I.pdf Download (229kB)
	Text 9-APPENDIX II.pdf Download (749kB)
	Text BUKU BIMBINGAN.pdf Download (466kB)
	Text CURRICULUM VITAE OF THE RESEARCHER.pdf Download (76kB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nikmah, Dewi Lutfiatun. Student Registered Number 3213113059. 2015. “An Analysis on Representative Acts in Film”Harry Potter and the Philoshper’s Stone” by J.K. Rowling. Sarjana Thesis. English Education Department. Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training. State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Tulungagung. Advisor: Dr. Sukarsono, M.Pd Keywords: Representative Acts, Illocutionary Acts, Conversational Fragments, Speech Acts, Pragmatics. Language is the main means communicating ideas with other people, either symbolic, written or orally. In communication, people talk with different listener differently in different situations. On one account, communication not only depends on recognizing the meaning of words in every utterance, but also recognizing what is meant by the utterance. Then, the meaning of each utterance itself is not only seen from lexical meaning but also from the situation and context. Context is very important to be considered. The study about contextual meaning is called pragmatics. This study pragmatically attempts to analyze representative acts, a kind of speech act that state what the speaker believes to be the case or not. The types of representative acts include informing, asserting, claiming, assuring, arguing, complaining, concluding, describing, and predicting. This study is conducted because the language of the native speaker film is an ideal manifestation of language use. By studying the realization of representative acts of the language used in “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone”, we can have good model how to realize English whenever we want to make some expressions and the teacher can take some samples to teach their students in having communication based on the situational context. Thus, this study would be of one valuable step for researched based teaching material for speaking class. The formulations of the research problem were: (1) what types of representative acts are found in conversational fragments in film ‘Harry Potter and the Philoshoper’s Stone’? (2) how are the formal patterns of those representative acts? (3) what is the frequency of each type of representative act found and its formal patterns in conversational fragments in film ‘Harry Potter and the Philoshoper’s Stone’? The purposes of this study were: (1) to know what type of representative acts found in conversational fragments in film ‘Harry Potter and the Philoshoper’s Stone’ 2) to know the formal patterns of representative acts in the conversational fragments in film “Harry Potter andthe Philoshoper’s Stone” 3) to find out the frequency of the type of representative acts and its formal pattern as found in conversational fragments in film “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone”. The research design of the study is descriptive quantitative survey which employs pragmatic analysis. It is intended to investigate those three research problems in relation to representative acts. The data collecting method used is documentation. The data are the utterances in conversational fragments found in Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone movie containing representative acts with population 424 utterances and 72 samples taken by purposive sampling. The data are taken from the script of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone movie along with their contexts derived from the movie scenes. The research results showed that: 1) 107 utterances included in arguing, 103 utterances categorized as informing, 80 utterances categorized as asserting, 58 utterances categorized as assuring, 22 utterances categorized as predicting, 18 utterances categorized as concluding, 15 utterances categorized as describing, 12 utterances included in complaining, and the least was categorized as claiming for only 9 utterances, 2) in arguing type, the researcher found 45 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 14 structure applied negative verbal pattern, 10 structure applied WH-question, 5 structures applied question tag, 2 structures applied positive verbal pattern (if-clause), 1 structure applied positive verbal pattern (if-clause), 23 structures applied positive nominal pattern, 7 structures applied negative nominal pattern; 55 utterances; in informing type 55 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 3 structures applied negative verbal pattern, 1 structure applied question tag, 43 structures applied positive nominal pattern, 1 structure applied negative nominal pattern; in asserting type found 44 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 7 structures applied negative verbal pattern, 2 structures applied question tag, 24 structures applied possitive nominal pattern, 3 structures applied negative nominal pattern; in assuring type found 27 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 6 structures applied negative verbal pattern, 2 structures applied question tag, 17 structures applied positive nominal pattern, 6 structures applied negative nominal pattern; in predicting type found 18 structure applied positive verbal pattern, 1 utterance applied question tag, 1 structure applied positive verbal (if-clause), 1 structure applied positive nominal pattern, 1 structure applied negative nominal pattern; in concluding type found 10 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 1 structure applied question tag, 6 structures applied positive nominal pattern, 1 structure applied negative nominal pattern; in describing type found 8 utterances applied positive verbal pattern, 2 utterances applied negative verbal pattern, 1 utterance applied negative verbal pattern (if-clause), 4 utterances applied positive nominal pattern; in complaining found 4 structures applied positive verbal pattern, 1 structure applied negative verbal pattern, 2 structures applied WH-question, 1 structure applied question tag and 1 structure applied negative verbal (if-clause),in claiming found 1 structure applied WH-question, 3 structures applied positive nominal pattern, and 5 structure applied positive verbal pattern, 3) the percentage of representative acts were 25% for arguing, 24% for informing, 19% for asserting, 14% for assuring, 5% for predicting, 4% for concluding, 4% for describing, 3% for complaining and 2% for claiming, The percentage of formal pattern in arguing type found 44.06% structure applied positive verbal pattern, 13.09% structure applied negative verbal pattern, 9.35% structure applied WH-question, 4.68% structure applied question tag, 1.86% structure applied positive verbal pattern (if-clause), 0.93% structure applied positive verbal pattern (if-clause), 21.49% structure applied positive nominal pattern, 7 structure applied negative nominal pattern; 6.54% utterances; in informing type 53.39% applied positive verbal pattern, 2.92% structure applied negative verbal pattern, 0.97% structure applied question tag, 41.75% structure applied positive nominal pattern, 0.97% structure applied negative nominal pattern; in asserting type found 55% structure applied positive verbal pattern, 8.75% structure applied negative verbal pattern, 2.5% structure applied question tag, 30% structure applied possitive nominal pattern, 3.75% structure applied negative nominal pattern; in assuring type found 47% structure applied positive verbal pattern, 10% structure applied negative verbal pattern, 4% structure applied question tag, 29% structure applied positive nominal pattern, 10% structure applied negative nominal pattern; in predicting type found 81.81% structure applied positive verbal pattern, 4.54% utterance applied question tag, 4.54% structure applied positive verbal (if-clause), 4.54% structure applied positive nominal pattern, 4.54% structure applied negative nominal pattern; in concluding type found 55.55% structures applied positive verbal pattern, 5.55% structure applied question tag, 33.33% structures applied positive nominal pattern, 5.55% structure applied negative nominal pattern; in describing type found 53.33% utterances applied positive verbal pattern, 13.33% utterances applied negative verbal pattern, 6.66% utterance applied negative verbal pattern (if-clause), 26.66% utterances applied positive nominal pattern; in complaining found 33.33% structures applied positive verbal pattern, 8.33% structure applied negative verbal pattern, 16.66% structures applied WH-question, 8.33% structure applied question tag and 8.33% structure applied negative verbal (if-clause),in claiming found 11.11% structure applied WH-question, 33.33% structures applied positive nominal pattern, and 55.56% structure applied positive verbal pattern. Based on the result of the study, The future researcher can conduct the similar research but in different subject. The next researcher can use the novel or students of university in conducting research similar to this topic. It should have different result because cultural differences and the subject are not the same.

Actions (login required)

View Item